Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cable Sizes"

Revision as of 00:09, 23 May 2007

I was not sure what the intention of the "buried" column was going to be. Since BS7671 has a number of versions of buried that could be used:

Method 2 : Buried direct in building materials - this is treated as method 1 (clipped direct)

Method 6 : In conduit in thermally insulating wall with one side in contact with a thermally conductive surface

Method 7 : cables in conduit in masonry

and then there is cable in insulating material which seems to have no "method", but counts for a 50% de-rating straight off.

Methods 1 and 2 are the most likely to be met during DIY I would guess, followed by 7

Any thoughts? Or scrap the column and point em at BS7671 or the OSG?

--John Rumm 03:33, 17 May 2007 (BST)

Could do. Or you could add a column or more, might be more informative. Upto you. NT 08:25, 17 May 2007 (BST)

Copied the information into the main cables one now. There is now not much need for this one IMHO.

--John Rumm 01:09, 23 May 2007 (BST)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 Could do. Or you could add a column or more, might be more informative. Upto you.
 [[User:NT|NT]] 08:25, 17 May 2007 (BST)
+== I suggest deleting this article ==
+Copied the information into the main cables one now. There is now not much need for this one IMHO.
+--[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 01:09, 23 May 2007 (BST)