Difference between revisions of "Talk:Part P - Discussion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(That link) |
m (moved Talk:Part P to Talk:Part P - Discussion: Allow for new primary article with Part P title) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
true. someone needs to extract the useful information and edit it into the page. | true. someone needs to extract the useful information and edit it into the page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | : Hopefully someone will feel like doing so at some point. Until then at least they can find the info if they need to, and page editors can work from it.[[User:NT|NT]] 18:02, 18 September 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
== That link == | == That link == | ||
That last link on part P is crap really - it is riddled with errors. There must be something better out there? | That last link on part P is crap really - it is riddled with errors. There must be something better out there? | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Well, I dont know where. I've removed the link [http://www.rla.org.uk/rla.exe?input=../rla/scrp/regsElectrical.htm Part P, what it covers and doesn't cover]. [[User:NT|NT]] 18:02, 18 September 2007 (BST) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:53, 22 March 2014
I don't think this page, with links to fragments of information buried in general waffle, is particularly useful.
Jon
true. someone needs to extract the useful information and edit it into the page.
- Hopefully someone will feel like doing so at some point. Until then at least they can find the info if they need to, and page editors can work from it.NT 18:02, 18 September 2007 (BST)
That link
That last link on part P is crap really - it is riddled with errors. There must be something better out there?
- Well, I dont know where. I've removed the link Part P, what it covers and doesn't cover. NT 18:02, 18 September 2007 (BST)