Talk:Fluorescent Lighting: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Vadalism? |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
--[[User:John Stumbles|John Stumbles]] 01:58, 22 February 2007 (GMT) | --[[User:John Stumbles|John Stumbles]] 01:58, 22 February 2007 (GMT) | ||
== Vadalism? == | |||
Not sure if someone just made a cockup or actually wanted to nuke the page. The IP address in question checks out as what looks like Oman telecom. Their abuse contact is: | |||
inetnum: 62.231.243.0 - 62.231.243.255 | |||
netname: OMAN-EXPN-2003 | |||
descr: PROVIDER | |||
country: OM | |||
remarks: FOR SPAM & NET ABUSE | |||
person: Ali Abduwani | |||
address: P.O.Box 789 address: Ruwi 112 OM | |||
phone: 968 631881 | |||
fax-no: 968 695482 | |||
e-mail: ali@omantel.co.om | |||
Not sent anything yet, but can wait and see if anything else happens. | |||
--[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 02:37, 1 July 2007 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 01:37, 1 July 2007
I'm quite interested in CFL; but have yet to understand how they might look in a standard halogen downlighter; even if that is possible - anyone know?
-- (anonymous)
The place to ask is on the newsgroup - discussion pages here are really about development of the article. Besides you'll get a lot more responses on the group.
--John Stumbles 01:58, 22 February 2007 (GMT)
Vadalism?
Not sure if someone just made a cockup or actually wanted to nuke the page. The IP address in question checks out as what looks like Oman telecom. Their abuse contact is:
inetnum: 62.231.243.0 - 62.231.243.255
netname: OMAN-EXPN-2003 descr: PROVIDER country: OM remarks: FOR SPAM & NET ABUSE
person: Ali Abduwani address: P.O.Box 789 address: Ruwi 112 OM phone: 968 631881 fax-no: 968 695482 e-mail: ali@omantel.co.om
Not sent anything yet, but can wait and see if anything else happens.
--John Rumm 02:37, 1 July 2007 (BST)