Difference between revisions of "Talk:CU"

From DIYWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Are we done with this one?)
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
--[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 15:12, 14 March 2009 (GMT)
 
--[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 15:12, 14 March 2009 (GMT)
 +
 +
 +
Theres a section in either [[Fuse]] or [[MCB]] on comparison of the two. But what you propose sounds like a decent idea.
 +
 +
Re this article, once all the sections are dealt with I think the top part of this one should remain, so the phrase 'CU' in aricles directs to here, and this page directs people to the many pages that cover CUs. Otherwise _we_ may know whats where, but the average DIYer looking for CU info is going to be quite hard pressed to find the relevant stuff.
 +
[[User:NT|NT]] 22:40, 14 March 2009 (GMT)

Revision as of 22:40, 14 March 2009

I have done my edits in the other version of this, however I will add comments here where appropriate.

The upgrades section is already covered in more detail in the changing a cu article.

Same goes for the sections on Upgrading on TT, and working on a CU.

--John Rumm 02:58, 8 March 2009 (GMT)

level of protection

I think this bit is missing the point really.

Fault current protection is required at the origin of the circuit. Overcurrent protection is typically also provided at the origin, but is not actually required to be there. By design one may choose to delegate the overcurrent protection to somewhere else. (i.e. this is not just about inheriting sub optimal situations from old installations)

For example two 16A radials connected to space heaters could legitimately be connected to one 32A MCB if it made more sense to have them controlled together (say both are in one room). If they were wired in 2.5mm^2 T&E then the 32A MCB would provide adequate protection in the event of a fault (e.g. damaged cable etc). However it would not provide protection from overload. In this circumstance the job has been delegated to the FCUs that connect the appliances. The maximum fuse that could be inserted in each is 13A, and the absence of any sockets or other FCUs prevents the maximum load on the circuit exceeding the nominal 26A

--John Rumm 03:08, 8 March 2009 (GMT)

Are we done with this one?

Most of the sections seem to have found a home in one place of another:

Split Load CU - in Consumer Units and basic house wiring

Upgrades - in detail in changing a cu

Upgrading CUs on TT installs - as above

Level of protection - dotted about the place - although its not really a CU specific thing as a circuit protection one.

Live parts - covered in the changing a CU and also in Fuses

Working on the CU - in changing and outside electrics

Trips - in RCD in detail and also Fuses plus other places.

The only one I am not sure about is: MCBs & Fuses - we don't really have a place for this, although it would probably be useful somewhere. I think I might create a dedicated Circuit Protection article to cover selection of protective devices. That could include recommendations such as described here.

--John Rumm 15:12, 14 March 2009 (GMT)


Theres a section in either Fuse or MCB on comparison of the two. But what you propose sounds like a decent idea.

Re this article, once all the sections are dealt with I think the top part of this one should remain, so the phrase 'CU' in aricles directs to here, and this page directs people to the many pages that cover CUs. Otherwise _we_ may know whats where, but the average DIYer looking for CU info is going to be quite hard pressed to find the relevant stuff. NT 22:40, 14 March 2009 (GMT)