Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cable Sizes"
('buried' column) |
(I suggest deleting this article) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Could do. Or you could add a column or more, might be more informative. Upto you. | Could do. Or you could add a column or more, might be more informative. Upto you. | ||
[[User:NT|NT]] 08:25, 17 May 2007 (BST) | [[User:NT|NT]] 08:25, 17 May 2007 (BST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == I suggest deleting this article == | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Copied the information into the main cables one now. There is now not much need for this one IMHO. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 01:09, 23 May 2007 (BST) |
Revision as of 00:09, 23 May 2007
Buried column
I was not sure what the intention of the "buried" column was going to be. Since BS7671 has a number of versions of buried that could be used:
Method 2 : Buried direct in building materials - this is treated as method 1 (clipped direct)
Method 6 : In conduit in thermally insulating wall with one side in contact with a thermally conductive surface
Method 7 : cables in conduit in masonry
and then there is cable in insulating material which seems to have no "method", but counts for a 50% de-rating straight off.
Methods 1 and 2 are the most likely to be met during DIY I would guess, followed by 7
Any thoughts? Or scrap the column and point em at BS7671 or the OSG?
--John Rumm 03:33, 17 May 2007 (BST)
Could do. Or you could add a column or more, might be more informative. Upto you.
NT 08:25, 17 May 2007 (BST)
I suggest deleting this article
Copied the information into the main cables one now. There is now not much need for this one IMHO.
--John Rumm 01:09, 23 May 2007 (BST)