Difference between revisions of "Talk:Consumer unit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Talk:Consumer Units moved to Talk:Consumer unit: linkability) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Thats a new one on me. | Thats a new one on me. | ||
[[User:NT|NT]] 11:32, 11 March 2009 (GMT) | [[User:NT|NT]] 11:32, 11 March 2009 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Its quite a long time since I worked on the wooden backed wylexes, I'd sooner rely on your memory on that. | ||
| + | |||
| + | However... Unless I'm mistook, all mains electrical accessories have required a non-flammable backbox since the 1930s. I would expect chemically treated softwood would be a logical replacement for oak. Given all this, should we be calling these boxes/plates flammable? It strikes me as probably not so. | ||
| + | [[User:NT|NT]] 03:16, 15 March 2009 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:29, 23 November 2010
Note the rewiring tips and house wiring for beginners articles also include duplicated content about types of CU / Split load etc.
Wood in old wylex boxes
None of the ones I have seen appear to be oak - looked more like a softwood. --John Rumm 04:47, 11 March 2009 (GMT)
Thats a new one on me. NT 11:32, 11 March 2009 (GMT)
Its quite a long time since I worked on the wooden backed wylexes, I'd sooner rely on your memory on that.
However... Unless I'm mistook, all mains electrical accessories have required a non-flammable backbox since the 1930s. I would expect chemically treated softwood would be a logical replacement for oak. Given all this, should we be calling these boxes/plates flammable? It strikes me as probably not so. NT 03:16, 15 March 2009 (GMT)