Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glossary"
(format discussion) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Ah, so it wasn't part of the master plan then?! | Ah, so it wasn't part of the master plan then?! | ||
| + | : more master ockup I think - NT | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
--[[User:John Stumbles|John Stumbles]] 13:33, 28 April 2007 (BST) | --[[User:John Stumbles|John Stumbles]] 13:33, 28 April 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | That's easily done with the text editor, but is there an advantage I'm not seeing? | ||
| + | [[User:NT|NT]] 18:33, 28 April 2007 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 17:33, 28 April 2007
Categories
I guess this one belongs in nearly all cats NT 17:29, 24 April 2007 (BST)
Yes I suppose we really need the ability to use a wildcard e.g. [[Category:*]] and have it appear automagically in every category listing. In the absence of such a facility it'd be a PITA to maintain it manually so maybe just 'Misc' or something? --John Stumbles 20:41, 24 April 2007 (BST)
I dont mind putting it in each category by hand some day. As and when.... NT 23:07, 24 April 2007 (BST)
Why is there a slightly-modified copy of the article here on the discussion page? --John Stumbles
Whoops - corrected :) NT 09:10, 28 April 2007 (BST)
Ah, so it wasn't part of the master plan then?!
- more master ockup I think - NT
BTW what about using formatting it as a definition list like:
- Round Tuit
- source of energy and motivation for DIY jobs
I'm not suggesting changing it all hand - I reckon running it all through a cunningly-crafted Perl incantation should do it. (I'm happy to give it a shot if you think the result would be worthwhile.)
--John Stumbles 13:33, 28 April 2007 (BST)
That's easily done with the text editor, but is there an advantage I'm not seeing?
NT 18:33, 28 April 2007 (BST)