Difference between revisions of "Talk:Impact driver"
m |
(yup) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
--[[User:John Stumbles|John Stumbles]] 14:51, 19 May 2007 (BST) | --[[User:John Stumbles|John Stumbles]] 14:51, 19 May 2007 (BST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Sounds a good idea to me. Are the powered ones more often called wrench or driver? If the latter, the final articles could be imapct driver (hand) and impact driver (powered) ... or something | ||
+ | [[User:NT|NT]] 15:42, 19 May 2007 (BST) |
Revision as of 14:42, 19 May 2007
Maybe we should rename this article 'Impact Wrench' and have the 'Impact Driver' article disambiguate between the uses of the term since it seems to be used for both the manual and powered variants.
We could have some pictures of the manual one to show what is meant:
http://www.dansmc.com/impactdriver.jpg
http://www.bombaydigital.com/boxster/projects/brakes/pictures/impact_driver_lg.jpeg
(Though best to source our own rather than steal either bandwidth or images from these sources).
And could show what is meant by the powered ones e.g. http://www.mytoolstore.com/makita/btd120sa.jpg
and some more from Screwfix and some from Toolstation
--John Stumbles 14:51, 19 May 2007 (BST)
Sounds a good idea to me. Are the powered ones more often called wrench or driver? If the latter, the final articles could be imapct driver (hand) and impact driver (powered) ... or something
NT 15:42, 19 May 2007 (BST)