Difference between revisions of "Talk:LV Wiring"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | It may be used that way in some areas but that doesnt make it so. I doubt you'll find any electronic engineer that will second the opinion that 500v is LV. | + | It may be used that way in some areas but that doesnt make it so, nor does one usage make it the only correct usage. I doubt you'll find any electronic engineer that will second the opinion that 500v is LV. Hopefully the rewording is clearer and more accurate, and acknowledges the variation in usage of the term. [[User:NT|NT]] 18:09, 6 January 2007 (GMT) |
| − | [[User:NT|NT]] 18:09, 6 January 2007 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 18:35, 6 January 2007
It may be used that way in some areas but that doesnt make it so, nor does one usage make it the only correct usage. I doubt you'll find any electronic engineer that will second the opinion that 500v is LV. Hopefully the rewording is clearer and more accurate, and acknowledges the variation in usage of the term. NT 18:09, 6 January 2007 (GMT)