Difference between revisions of "Talk:ELCB"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→obsolete?: new section) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I will create a redirect | :I will create a redirect | ||
--[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 04:36, 13 November 2012 (GMT) | --[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 04:36, 13 November 2012 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I was trying to avoid changing the name while people are still reading and commenting based on the link posted to the group. | ||
I'll get back to the other article when I get enough time to do it justice | I'll get back to the other article when I get enough time to do it justice | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
* obsolescent: becoming obsolete | * obsolescent: becoming obsolete | ||
[[User:NT|NT]] 02:26, 14 November 2012 (GMT) | [[User:NT|NT]] 02:26, 14 November 2012 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Obsolete seems about right. They have not been sold or fitted for decades, and no one would recommend their use for anything now. | ||
| + | --[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 17:32, 14 November 2012 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 17:32, 14 November 2012
Rename
Propose rename to ELCB.
- I will create a redirect
--John Rumm 04:36, 13 November 2012 (GMT)
- I was trying to avoid changing the name while people are still reading and commenting based on the link posted to the group.
I'll get back to the other article when I get enough time to do it justice NT 00:42, 13 November 2012 (GMT)
obsolete?
- obsolete: no longer in use or no longer useful
- obsolescent: becoming obsolete
NT 02:26, 14 November 2012 (GMT)
- Obsolete seems about right. They have not been sold or fitted for decades, and no one would recommend their use for anything now.
--John Rumm 17:32, 14 November 2012 (GMT)