Difference between revisions of "Talk:How To Construct Mobile Phone Jammer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "This article will need disclaimers to highlight its use in the UK would be illegal... --~~~~") |
(→I vote for delete: new section) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
--[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 15:49, 5 July 2011 (BST) | --[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 15:49, 5 July 2011 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Does it qualify as diy? | ||
| + | |||
| + | FWIW, a 6v 4xAA battery and a diode dropper would last far longer. | ||
| + | [[User:NT|NT]] 10:56, 6 July 2011 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Article seems to be a lift of... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This [http://blockyourid.com/~gbpprorg/mil/celljam/simple/index.html one] - but with poorer English! | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 05:04, 7 July 2011 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looks like this is getting posted elsewhere in an attempt to promote the linked site, [http://www.wikihow.com/Make-Your-Own-Cell-Phone-Jammer e.g.] | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 15:37, 7 July 2011 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Keep or delete? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Do folks want to keep or delete this article? I think I lean toward the latter, since its not diy related, the project is illegal to construct, and I doubt even one person on ukdiy has done this. | ||
| + | [[User:NT|NT]] 20:23, 15 January 2012 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == I vote for delete == | ||
| + | |||
| + | its only had 40 page views - and most of those were probably us! | ||
Latest revision as of 23:31, 19 January 2012
This article will need disclaimers to highlight its use in the UK would be illegal...
--John Rumm 15:49, 5 July 2011 (BST)
Does it qualify as diy?
FWIW, a 6v 4xAA battery and a diode dropper would last far longer. NT 10:56, 6 July 2011 (BST)
Article seems to be a lift of...
This one - but with poorer English!
--John Rumm 05:04, 7 July 2011 (BST)
Looks like this is getting posted elsewhere in an attempt to promote the linked site, e.g.
--John Rumm 15:37, 7 July 2011 (BST)
Keep or delete?
Do folks want to keep or delete this article? I think I lean toward the latter, since its not diy related, the project is illegal to construct, and I doubt even one person on ukdiy has done this. NT 20:23, 15 January 2012 (GMT)
I vote for delete
its only had 40 page views - and most of those were probably us!