Difference between revisions of "Talk:How To Construct Mobile Phone Jammer"

From DIYWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎I vote for delete: new section)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
FWIW, a 6v 4xAA battery and a diode dropper would last far longer.
 
FWIW, a 6v 4xAA battery and a diode dropper would last far longer.
 
[[User:NT|NT]] 10:56, 6 July 2011 (BST)
 
[[User:NT|NT]] 10:56, 6 July 2011 (BST)
 +
 +
== Article seems to be a lift of... ==
 +
 +
This [http://blockyourid.com/~gbpprorg/mil/celljam/simple/index.html one] - but with poorer English!
 +
 +
--[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 05:04, 7 July 2011 (BST)
 +
 +
Looks like this is getting posted elsewhere in an attempt to promote the linked site, [http://www.wikihow.com/Make-Your-Own-Cell-Phone-Jammer e.g.]
 +
 +
--[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 15:37, 7 July 2011 (BST)
 +
 +
== Keep or delete? ==
 +
 +
Do folks want to keep or delete this article? I think I lean toward the latter, since its not diy related, the project is illegal to construct, and I doubt even one person on ukdiy has done this.
 +
[[User:NT|NT]] 20:23, 15 January 2012 (GMT)
 +
 +
== I vote for delete ==
 +
 +
its only had 40 page views - and most of those were probably us!

Latest revision as of 23:31, 19 January 2012

This article will need disclaimers to highlight its use in the UK would be illegal...

--John Rumm 15:49, 5 July 2011 (BST)


Does it qualify as diy?

FWIW, a 6v 4xAA battery and a diode dropper would last far longer. NT 10:56, 6 July 2011 (BST)

Article seems to be a lift of...

This one - but with poorer English!

--John Rumm 05:04, 7 July 2011 (BST)

Looks like this is getting posted elsewhere in an attempt to promote the linked site, e.g.

--John Rumm 15:37, 7 July 2011 (BST)

Keep or delete?

Do folks want to keep or delete this article? I think I lean toward the latter, since its not diy related, the project is illegal to construct, and I doubt even one person on ukdiy has done this. NT 20:23, 15 January 2012 (GMT)

I vote for delete

its only had 40 page views - and most of those were probably us!