Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page/Discussion"

From DIYWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(B Tramadol B Online Buy Fioricet Viagra Cialis Best Free XXX Best Free Fast Seacrh Free Porn Star Viagra Fioricet Tramadol Xanax Soma Best Free Movie Porn)
m (revert spam)
Line 60: Line 60:
  
 
--[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 20:24, 17 July 2007 (BST)
 
--[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 20:24, 17 July 2007 (BST)
 
== B Tramadol B Online Buy Fioricet Viagra Cialis Best Free XXX Best Free Fast Seacrh Free Porn Star Viagra Fioricet Tramadol Xanax Soma Best Free Movie Porn ==
 
 
Has seen on the Internet a good site. Personally to me has liked.
 
All that is necessary for soul and in one place. Convenient search
 
<a href=http://viagra7.com/>BEST MEGA ULTRA SEARCH</a>
 
<a href=http://www.viagra7.com>Mega Porn</a>
 
<a href=http://viagra7.com/>Viagra Online</a> <a href=http://viagra7.com/>Tramadol Online</a>
 
<a href=http://viagra7.com/>Fioricet Online </a> <a href=http://viagra7.com/>carisoprodol</a>
 
<a href=http://viagra7.com/>Best Porn Photo Movie XXX</a> <a href=http://viagra7.com/>Free Porn</a>
 
<a href=http://viagra7.com/>Star Porn </a> <a href=http://viagra7.com/>Casino Online</a>
 
<a href=http://viagra7.com/>Play Poker</a>
 
<a href=http://viagra7.com/><b>FIORICET ONLINE BEST FIORICET BUY FIORICET</b> </a>
 
<a href=http://viagra7.com/><b>Viagra Online Best Viagra Buy Viagra Order Viagra</b> </a>
 
<a href=http://viagra7.com/><b>Tramadol online</b> </a>
 
<a href=http://viagra7.com/><b>Viagra generic</b> </a>
 
Best regards, your site too best!
 
With all respect for administration of this site
 
Excuse for inconveniences. Also do not hold a harm
 

Revision as of 12:58, 20 July 2007

This page is for discussion of the DIY Wiki main page, and the Wiki as a whole.

It also seems to be a favoured place for spammers advertising dodgy pharmaceuticals, fakereplica Rolexes and so on <sigh>

Previous discussions on this page have been Archived

spam

Since the 203.162.0.0 netblock seems to have been a frequent source of spam, and we probably don't care too much if vietnam has access to this UK resource, anyone up for blocking a range of IP addresses?

203.162.16.0 - 203.162.31.255

netname:      VDC-NET 
country:      vn 
descr:        VietNam Data Communication Company 
admin-c:       KNH1-AP 
tech-c:        DAD1-AP 
status:       ALLOCATED NON-PORTABLE 
changed:      hm-changed@vnnic.net.vn
20061102 
mnt-by:        MAINT-VN-VNPT 
source:       APNIC 
person:       Khanh Nguyen Hien 
nic-hdl:       KNH1-AP 
e-mail:       anhdzung@vdc.com.vn


--John Rumm 02:53, 16 July 2007 (BST)


good idea NT 18:09, 16 July 2007 (BST)

I would suggest

A block on 203.162.27.0/255.255.255.0 since that class C has been the source of at least 5 attacks in the last month.

--John Rumm 21:17, 16 July 2007 (BST)

Sounds good to me John NT

blocking netblocks

I don't think we can block netblocks via the wiki software (though it could obviously be done at the server level.)

--John Stumbles 19:31, 17 July 2007 (BST)

How do the wiki blocking controls work, by blocking all access, or by just blocking write access?

We can only (AFAICT) block individual users/IP addresses. Obviously all the spammers have been just IPs. --John Stumbles 01:06, 18 July 2007 (BST)
I meant more in terms of what does a blocked user see - does blocking them chop off all access to the site, or just prevent them making edits? The other solution should spam become a particular problem would be to change policy such that a user account is required (possibly with pre approval on account creation). --John Rumm 13:27, 18 July 2007 (BST)
Er, dunno. I guess it just makes the 'edit' functions unavailable to that user, or probably redirects edit attempts to a why-you-are-blocked page.
I could block you and you could tell us :-)
--John Stumbles 23:54, 18 July 2007 (BST)

If it was done at the server level (say using ipchains) then that would block all access - the server would simply cease to exist to any user on the blocked address range. That may be a little more severe than is really required (then again probably not an issue).

--John Rumm 20:24, 17 July 2007 (BST)