Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wattle & Daub: an Explanation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(propose delete) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This link is in the PP links article, the article has no further content and no other contributors. I propose deletion. | This link is in the PP links article, the article has no further content and no other contributors. I propose deletion. | ||
[[User:NT|NT]] 09:46, 10 May 2007 (BST) | [[User:NT|NT]] 09:46, 10 May 2007 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I would tend to agree. Too many empty articles with no content other than a link tend to make browsing the wiki less satisfying - it can take a while to find any real content. Where there is no home grown info to add, it seems that lumping links into a page of other related ones makes more sense. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:John Rumm|John Rumm]] 15:18, 10 May 2007 (BST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:18, 10 May 2007
Deletion
This link is in the PP links article, the article has no further content and no other contributors. I propose deletion. NT 09:46, 10 May 2007 (BST)
I would tend to agree. Too many empty articles with no content other than a link tend to make browsing the wiki less satisfying - it can take a while to find any real content. Where there is no home grown info to add, it seems that lumping links into a page of other related ones makes more sense.
--John Rumm 15:18, 10 May 2007 (BST)